ABSTRACT
Background: Due to societal factors in the US, racial/ethnic minority adults are disproportionately impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly those with existing comorbid conditions such as cancer. It is currently unknown whether disparities exist in cancer treatment delivery among racial/ethnic minority patients with cancer and SARS-CoV-2. Methods: Data were obtained from the ASCO COVID-19 and Cancer Registry (March 2020-July 2021), including data from cancer patients diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 during their care (n=3193) at 60 practices across the US. Data included patient demographics, SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis and treatment, cancer clinical characteristics, and modifications to cancer treatment plans. Cancer treatment delay or discontinuation (TDD) was defined as any treatment postponed more than two weeks from the original scheduled date. We descriptively evaluated demographic and clinical characteristics, compared disparities in TDD by race/ethnicity and urban/rural residency, and evaluated reasons for TDD as reported by the clinics. We computed adjusted odds ratios (aOR) using multivariable logistic regression, accounting for non-independence of patients within hospitals to evaluate racial/ethnic disparities of TDD. Multivariable models were adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, number of comorbidities, cancer type, cancer extent, cancer status at SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis (progressing/stable) and SARS-CoV-2 severity (death/hospitalization/ICU admission/mechanical ventilation). Results: Cancer patients with SARS-CoV-2were mostly female (57%), urban residents (84%), and NH-White (66%);49% were 65+ years old. Most patients had solid tumors (75%). At SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis, 2403 patients (76%) were scheduled to receive drug-based therapy (69%), radiation therapy (7%), surgery (4%), or transplant (0.7%), of whom 49% experienced TDD. The most reported TDD reason from the clinic perspective was the patient's COVID-19 disease (90%). Overall, NH-Black (64%) and Hispanic (57%) with SARS-CoV-2 were more likely to experience TDD versus NH-White adults (46%) (p<0.001). This disparity was also observed across urban residing adults (p<0.001). Among rural adults, NH-AI/AN (75%) and NH-Black (61%) were more likely to experience TDD versus NH-White patients (39%). In multivariable analyses, disparities persisted, by NH-Black cancer patients with 92% (aOR:1.92, 95% CI:1.24-2.96) and Hispanic patients with 41% (aOR:1.41, 95% CI:1.03-1.91) higher odds of experiencing TDD. We observed consistent results among urban and rural subgroups. Conclusion: Racial/ethnic disparities exist in TDD among cancer patients with SARS-CoV-2 in urban and rural care settings. Future studies should evaluate the impacts of delays to cancer treatment delivery on cancer outcomes among minoritized communities in the US.
ABSTRACT
The COVID-19 pandemic has led to extensive social changes, which may increase the risk of experiencing social isolation, particularly in cancer patients who are at high risk of having poor outcomes if infected with COVID-19. It is unclear if pandemic-related risk mitigation behaviors (e.g., limiting attendance at social gatherings, mask wearing) influence social isolation. We leveraged data from 9,514 patients with cancer, or at high risk for cancer, from Moffitt Cancer Center to examine whether social isolation is associated with sociodemographic factors and risk mitigation behaviors. Eligible patients who had an appointment at the cancer center in the past five years, reported an email address, and had consented to the institutional biobanking protocol were invited to complete a survey regarding demographic, behavioral, and lifestyle factors as well as social isolation measured using the 4-item PROMIS Social Isolation scale. The raw PROMIS score was converted to a T-score and was split at 50, the average for the general U.S. population, and univariable and multivariable logistic regression was performed. Behavioral factors were measured on a Likert scale, ranging from “never” or “not at all”, to “very often” or “a lot”, and were evaluated continuously. Most participants were female (60.5%), Non-Hispanic White (90.3%), and had been diagnosed with cancer (89.6%);mean age was 64 years old. Only 3.5% reported ever testing positive for COVID-19, and 4.6% reported currently smoking. In univariable models, younger age, women, current smokers, and Hispanic ethnicity or Non-White race were associated with higher odds of social isolation. Among risk mitigation behaviors, leaving the house less often, attending social gatherings less often, a greater change in day-to-day life due to the pandemic, less physical contact with others outside their home, and wearing a mask more often were also associated with increased odds of social isolation. In the multivariable model including significant univariate factors, older patients (OR, per one year: 0.97;95%CI: 0.97-0.98) and males (OR, vs. females: 0.64;95%CI: 0.58-0.71) had lower odds of social isolation. Further, perceived changes in day-to-day life (OR, per one unit increase: 1.64 95%CI: 1.56-1.73), leaving the house less often (OR, per one unit increase: 0.75;95%CI: 0.71-0.80), and attending social gatherings less often (OR, per one unit increase: 0.92 95%CI: 0.84-0.95) remained associated with social isolation. Overall, behavior change to mitigate risk of COVID-19 infection was associated with more social isolation for cancer patients and survivors. Women, younger patients, and current smokers may be particularly at risk, suggesting targeted interventions to reduce feelings of social isolation in these populations may be warranted.
ABSTRACT
This study evaluated approaches for recruiting patients at a cancer center to an electronic survey about their experience with the COVID-19 pandemic. Eight groups (n = 2,750 patients total) were contacted via email to complete a 15-minute survey. Groups consisted of: 1) a detailed email only, 2) a brief email only, 3) a mailed letter and brief email, 4) a mailed letter, small prize in the envelope, and brief email, 5) a mailed postcard and brief email, 6) a brief email and $10 gift card, 7) a mailed letter, brief email and $10 gift card, and 8) a mailed postcard, brief email, and $10 gift card. Patients were considered eligible if they had a valid email address, were seen at the cancer center since January 1, 2015, had English as a preferred language, a last known vital status of alive, an address inside the cancer center's catchment area, and were between 40 and 89 years old. Patients were over sampled for Hispanic ethnicity and African American race, then randomly sampled. Response rates were evaluated overall, by race/ethnicity, gender, time since visit to the cancer center and age. Multiple logistic regression was used to assess the odds of completing the survey. 259 patients (9.4%) completed the survey across all pilot groups. Response rates varied by pilot group, ranging from 2.6% response for a detailed email only, to 18.4% response for a brief email, postcard and gift card. The latter group was also among the highest for response rates among Hispanics (25.6%) and Non-Hispanic/Non-White patients (15.9%). In a multivariate model adjusting for race, ethnicity, age, and gender, we found those who received a gift card had 1.86 times (95% CI: 1.40-2.48) higher odds of completing the survey than those who did not. Additionally, those who received a postcard or letter compared to those who only received an email had 1.46 times (95% CI: 1.05-2.04) higher odds of completing the survey. In our study of cancer patients seen at a major cancer center, prompting potential study participants with a letter or postcard before an email improved response rates. Further including a gift card increased response rates, particularly for underrepresented minorities. Future analyses include evaluating response rates by insurance status and cancer type.
ABSTRACT
Purpose: The COVID-19 pandemic has substantially changed social practices, economic stability, and access to medical care that may significantly affect cancer patients, especially those undergoing active treatment. We characterized the pandemic's influence on healthcare delivery, behavioral health, and financial stress in cancer patients. Methods: We included data from N = 1,253 adult cancer patients, who visitedHCI in the last 4 years, consented to the Total Cancer Care study, and completed a COVID-19 survey as part of the COPES consortium. The survey was administered between Aug and Sept 2020 and included questions on change/cancellation of medical visits, change in exercise and alcohol consumption, daily life, social interactions, and financial stress sinceMarch 2020. Results:The cohort'smean agewas 60.4 (19-92) years, with 54% female, 68% non-Hispanic White, 41% retired, 43% employed full or part-time, and 24% living in rural counties.Among the 27% of patients who reported receiving current treatment at HCI, 30% had to change or cancel a medical visit due to the pandemic, with 2% reported a change/cancellation in a biopsy, surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy;5% reported a change/cancellation in imaging;and 3% and 23%reported a change/cancellation in cancer screening and doctor's visit, respectively. 18% rescheduled an appointment to a telehealth visit. Changes in exercise habits due to the pandemic were common (47%), with 10% no longer exercising regularly, 21% exercising less, and 11% exercising more than before. 5% reported increased alcohol consumption, while 6% reported a decrease. Most patients (84%) experienced a change in their daily lives (ranging from somewhat to a lot of change). 69% had fewer social interactions, and 49% reported financial stress due to the pandemic, with 11% reporting being quite a bit/very much financially stressed. Conclusions: These findings suggest that within approximately the first 6 months, the COVID-19 pandemic had a substantial impact on cancer patients' lives, with adverse effects on health behaviors and financial stress. Healthcare delivery continued for essential cancer care but was disrupted for other services, such as cancer screening. Further analyses are underway.